JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 31, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Omaira Rojas Gomez Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
Conflicto De Competencia De Tutela
  • Jueces de una misma jurisdicción y distintos distritos judiciales
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó remitir el expediente a la Sala Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia para que defina cuál de los dos juzgados del circuito es competente para conocer de la acción de tutela incoada por la ciudadana de la referencia contra la Gobernación del Valle del Cauca y la Secretaria de Educación Departamental.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. ORDENAR que por Secretaria General se remita el expediente a la Sala Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para que ella defina cual de los dos juzgados del circuito es competente para conocer de la accion de tutela incoada por Omaira Rojas Gomez y otros, contra la Gobernacion del Valle del Cauca y la Secretaria de Educacion Departamental.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.